Cited by 110Educational Research and MethodsEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

Current Trends in Research Methodology and Statistics in Applied Linguistics

Lazaraton, Anne·2000·TESOL Quarterly

Abstract

* The past decade has seen second of of the research in applied linguistics, as evidenced by the increasing prominence of qualitative research as both subject of theoretical discussion and method for conducting empirical work (Lazaraton, 1995). The first coming of age was remarked on by Henning (1986), who noted sharp increase in the number of quantitative articles in both TESOL Quarterly and Language Learning from 1970 to 1985, which he viewed as a positive development-a kind of coming of age of discipline (p. 704). At about the same time, Lazaraton, Riggenbach, and Ediger (1987) reported on survey of 121 professionals in field, mostly university faculty working in North America, which asked them about their attitudes toward statistics and empirical research and their knowledge in these areas. The majority of the respondents indicated that they had taken, at most, one or two courses in research design and statistics, number most felt was insufficient for the work and advising they were doing. The second area surveyed was the respondents' ability to use and to interpret 23 statistical terms (such as mean or median) and statistical procedures (such as correlation or t test). On 4-point scale, respondents reported mean of less than 2 for terms like power, Rasch model, and Scheffe test.'

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3588103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The volume of published qualitative studies in language education has notably increased in the 25 years since Edge and Richards' (1998) landmark discussion.

    “In the 25 years since the publishing of Edge and Richards ' (1998) landmark discussion of epistemological claims in qualitative applied linguistics research, the volume of published qualitative studies in language education has notably increased (Benson et al., 2009; Lazaraton, 2000; McKinley, 2019; Richards, 2006, 2009; Zhang, 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lazaraton, A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Lazaraton, Anne
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2000
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
175
ISSN
0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107616464
Cited by
110
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
TESOL Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
statistics education, qualitative research, quantitative research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review