Cited by 48Medieval Literature and HistoryMedieval European Literature and HistoryHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

English Learning in the Late Twelfth Century

Hunt, R. W.·1936·Transactions of the Royal Historical Society

Abstract

The title of this paper may raise false hopes in the minds of many; and it will be well to explain what has been attempted. English writers of the later twelfth century have on the whole been neglected; and when I was investigating the life and works of Alexander Nequam, it was necessary, in order to keep a sense of proportion, to try to learn something about the schools of the time, and to look at the work of some of his contemporaries. One or two things of interest have come to light, which I have tried to set out here. But the picture is far from complete. Nothing, for example, is said about legal studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3678685

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. MSS. of the Duke of Rutland, IV, 82
  2. James, 1931, Two Ancient English Scholars, 19
  3. Spec, fidei, 380
  4. Vaux, 1934, Notes et textes sur I'Avicennisme latin, Bibl. Thomiste
  5. Lacombe, Aus der Geisteswelt des Mittelalters, 1, 463
  6. Faral, 1924, Les arts poétiques du xiie et clu xiiie stécle, 17
  7. Vaux, Notes et textes sur VAvicennisme latin, XX, Bibl. Thomiste, 138
  8. Butler H. E. , Medium Aevum IV, 1935, 143 a n d the description in the Catalogue by M. R. James. Father Ziegler tells me it is much the earliest reference to geomancy in England. · DOI
  9. 1927, Studies in the History of Medieval Science
  10. Paetow, Morale scolarium of John of Garland, 83
  11. Jourdain, 1843, Recherches sur les anciennes traductions d'Aristote, 449
  12. Riley, Gesta Abbatum, I, 194
  13. Arnold, Memorials of St. Edmund's Abbey, I, 323
  14. 1911, Gesch. der schol. Methode, II, 510
  15. 1928, Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 301
  16. De artif. modo pred, II, 1
  17. Coulton, 1919, Social Life in Britain
  18. Wilmart, 1930, Méanges Mandonnet, Bibl. Thomiste, 161
  19. Turner, 1916, Early Worcester MSS
  20. Macray, Chron. abb. Evesham, 232

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hunt, R. W.
Corresponding author
Hunt, R. W.
Venue
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society
Published
1936-12
Volume
19
Pages
19-42
ISSN
  • 0080-4401 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0648
OpenAlex
W2335604220
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
27.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Medieval European Literature and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Keywords
English language learning, 12th century, medieval education, schools, legal scholarship, twelfth-century England

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review