The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding
Abstract
Noam Chomsky, more than any other researcher, has radically restructured the study of human language over the past several decades. While the study of government and binding is an outgrowth of Chomsky's earlier work in transformational grammar, it represents a significant shift in focus and a new direction of investigation into the fundamentals of linguistic theory.This monograph consolidates and extends this new approach. It serves as a concise introduction to government-binding theory, applies it to several new domains of empirical data, and proposes some revisions to the principles of the theory that lead to greater unification, descriptive scope, and explanatory depth.Earlier work in the theory of grammar was concerned primarily with rule systems. The accent in government-binding theory, however, is on systems of principles of universal grammar. In the course of this book, Chomsky proposes and evaluates various general principles that limit and constrain the types of rules that are possible, and the ways they interact and function. In particular, he proposes that rule systems are in fact highly restricted in variety: only a finite number of grammars are attainable in principle, and these fall into a limited set of types.Another consequence of this shift in focus is the change of emphasis from derivations to representations. The major topic in the study of syntactic representations is the analysis of empty categories, which is a central theme of the book. After his introductory comments and a chapter on the variety of rule system, Chomsky takes up, in turn, the general properties of empty categories, the functional determination of empty categories, parasitic gaps, and binding theory and the typology of empty categories.Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor at MIT. The book is the sixth in the series Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, edited by Samuel Jay Keyser.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the Nature of Proper Government
Lasnik, H., & Saito, M. (1990) · Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-6859-3_10 · Cited by 759
Learning argument structure generalizations
(2004) · cogl · doi:10.1515/cogl.2004.011 · Cited by 678
Arabic Natural Language Processing: Challenges and Solutions
Farghaly, A., & Shaalan, K. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/1644879.1644881 · Cited by 557
Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00043521 · Cited by 520
Levinson, S. C. (1987) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0022226700011324 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Owen, M., & Chomsky, N.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986-07
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 687
- ISSN
- 0026-7937 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981818098
- Cited by
- 2,034
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 604.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3729191
- The paper
- Owen, M., & Chomsky, N. (1986). Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. The Modern Language Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/3729191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.