The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature
Abstract
Contributors. Rosemary J. Coombe, Margreta de Grazia, Marvin D'Lugo, John Feather, N. N. Feltes, Ann Ruggles Gere, Peter Jaszi, Gerhard Joseph, Peter Lindenbaum, Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa Ede, Jeffrey A. Masten, Thomas Pfau, Monroe E. Price and Malla Pollack, Mark Rose, Marlon B. Ross, David Sanjek, Thomas Streeter, Jim Swan, Max W. Thomas, Martha Woodmansee, Alfred C. Yen
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2158 · Cited by 709
Reflection Revisited: The Class Collage
Sommers, J. (2011) · Journal of Basic Writing · doi:10.37514/jbw-j.2011.30.1.05 · Cited by 49
The evolution of authorship in a remix society
Diakopoulos, N., Luther, K., Medynskiy, Y. (., & Essa, I. (2007) · Proceedings of the eighteenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia · doi:10.1145/1286240.1286272 · Cited by 49
Charting the Digital Literary Sphere
MURRAY, S. (2015) · Contemporary Literature · doi:10.3368/cl.56.2.311 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Parrinder, P., Woodmansee, M., & Jaszi, P.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 140
- ISSN
- 0026-7937 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980954975
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 302.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
