Cited by 49Media and Digital CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights and MediaLiteracy, Media, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The evolution of authorship in a remix society

Diakopoulos, Nicholas, Luther, Kurt, Medynskiy, Yevgeniy (Eugene), Essa, Irfan·2007·Proceedings of the eighteenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia

Abstract

Authorship entails the constrained selection or generation of media and the organization and layout of that media in a larger structure. But authorship is more than just selection and organization; it is a complex construct incorporating concepts of originality, authority, intertextuality, and attribution. In this paper we explore these concepts and ask how they are changing in light of modes of collaborative authorship in remix culture. We present a qualitative case study of an online video remixing site, illustrating how the constraints of that environment are impacting authorial constructs. We discuss users' self-conceptions as authors, and how values related to authorship are reflected to users through the interface and design of the site's tools. We also present some implications for the design of online communities for collaborative media creation and remixing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1286240.1286272

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Barthes R., 1978, Image
  2. Douglas J. Y. The End of Books - Or Books Without End? 2000. Douglas J. Y. The End of Books - Or Books Without End? 2000. · DOI
  3. Kwall R. R. The Attribution Right in the United States: Caught in the Crossfire between Copyright and Section 43(A). Washington Law Review 77. Kwall R. R. The Attribution Right in the United States: Caught in the Crossfire between Copyright and Section 43(A). Washington Law Review 77.
  4. Landow G., 1997, Johns Hopkins University Press
  5. Rose M., 1993, Harvard University Press
  6. Sarris A., 2000, Cooper Square Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Diakopoulos, N., Luther, K., Medynskiy, Y. (., & Essa, I.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the eighteenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia
Publisher
ACM
Published
2007-09-10
Pages
133-136
OpenAlex
W2111575693
Cited by
49
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Rights and Media
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
authorship, remix culture, collaborative authorship, originality, intertextuality, attribution, online communities, user interface design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review