The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics
Abstract
From the Publisher: In this age of DNA computers and artificial intelligence, information is becoming disembodied even as the "bodies" that once carried it vanish into virtuality. While some marvel at these changes, envisioning consciousness downloaded into a computer or humans "beamed" Star Trek-style, others view them with horror, seeing monsters brooding in the machines. In How We Became Posthuman, N. Katherine Hayles separates hype from fact, investigating the fate of embodiment in an information age. Hayles relates three interwoven stories: how information lost its body, that is, how it came to be conceptualized as an entity separate from the material forms that carry it; the cultural and technological construction of the cyborg; and the dismantling of the liberal humanist "subject" in cybernetic discourse, along with the emergence of the "posthuman." Ranging widely across the history of technology, cultural studies, and literary criticism, Hayles shows what had to be erased, forgotten, and elided to conceive of information as a disembodied entity. Thus she moves from the post-World War II Macy Conferences on cybernetics to the 1952 novel Limbo by cybernetics aficionado Bernard Wolfe; from the concept of self-making to Philip K. Dick's literary explorations of hallucination and reality; and from artificial life to postmodern novels exploring the implications of seeing humans as cybernetic systems. Although becoming posthuman can be nightmarish, Hayles shows how it can also be liberating. From the birth of cybernetics to artificial life, How We Became Posthuman provides an indispensable account of how we arrived in our virtual age, and of where we might go from here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2006) · Cited by 2,256
Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716 · Cited by 1,258
The social power of algorithms
Beer, D. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1216147 · Cited by 945
The Affective Turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies
Clough, P. T. (2008) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276407085156 · Cited by 722
From Cyber to Hybrid: Mobile Technologies as Interfaces of Hybrid Spaces
de Souza e Silva, A. (2006) · Space and Culture · doi:10.1177/1206331206289022 · Cited by 693
Metadata
- Authors
- Tambling, J., & Hayles, N. K.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143
- ISSN
- 0026-7937 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2323828001
- Cited by
- 2,141
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 425.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3735725
- The paper
- Tambling, J., & Hayles, N. K. (2001). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. The Modern Language Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/3735725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.