Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The obtained Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates had morphological characteristics consistent with those previously reported for the species.
“These observed morphological characteristics are consistent with those previously reported for the C. gloeosporioides species (Barnett and Hunter 1972;Chowdappa et al. 2012;Weir et al. 2012).”
From Antifungal Potential of Chitosan and Phenyllactic Acid against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, the Anthracnose Pathogen in Avocados (2025) · cites this paper as Barnett and Hunter 1972
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hamidou, H. A. (2025) · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology · doi:10.17957/ijab/15.2384 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- M., G. W., & Barnett, H. L.
- Venue
- Mycologia
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1955-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 616
- ISSN
- 0027-5514 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205316994
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mycologia (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Infectious Diseases and Mycology
- Keywords
- imperfect fungi, fungal genera, fungal taxonomy, mycological illustration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
