The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Animals Are Good to Think and Good to Prohibit
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1987) · PubMed · Cited by 1,496
gastro‐politics in Hindu South Asia
APPADURAI, A. (1981) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.1981.8.3.02a00050 · Cited by 1,050
“Cultural” Concepts and the Language‐Culture Nexus
Silverstein, M. (2004) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/423971 · Cited by 677
Body, Psyche, and Culture: The Relationship between Disgust and Morality
Haidt, J., Rozin, P., Mccauley, C., & Imada, S. (1997) · Psychology and Developing Societies · doi:10.1177/097133369700900105 · Cited by 577
The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification
Hunn, E. (1982) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1982.84.4.02a00070 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Tambiah, S. J.
- Venue
- Ethnology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1969-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 423
- ISSN
- 0014-1828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2496507867
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animals Are Good to Think and Good to Prohibit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3772910
- The paper
- Tambiah, S. J. (1969). Animals Are Good to Think and Good to Prohibit. Ethnology. https://doi.org/10.2307/3772910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
