The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Density-Dependence of Spatial Behaviour and the Rarity of Randomness
Abstract
1. Spatial distribution was analysed in 156 sets of field data comprising more than 200,000 sample units in 3840 samples from 102 species. 2. Taylor's model, proposing that spatial variance is proportional to a fractional power of mean population density, provided an appropriate description of 147 sets of data. 3. Iwao's mean crowding model provided a rather less adequate alternative but with marked limitations. 4. The negative binomial with a common k was not satisfactory. 5. Two data sets only were judged random at all population densities. 6. In all other sets of samples, only at or near the lowest densities was disposition indistinguishable from random and the range of spacing between individuals progressively and disproportionately changed as mean density increased. 7. Spatial disposition is thus density-dependent and we deduce that spatial behaviour is also density-dependent as required by Taylor and Taylor's delta-model for intrinsic population contril by movement. 8. The sepcies examined range from Protista through annelids, molluscs, crustaceans, arachnids, insects, echinoderms, fish, birds and quadrupeds to men and orchids. 9. The sampling scales range from ciliates on the surface of a flat-worm to the human population of the United States of America and include temporally stable and unstable populations. 10. The sampling methods range from quadrat counts, through trap, net and grab samples to volumetric samples and complete censuses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aggregation, Variance and the Mean
TAYLOR, L. R. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/189732a0 · Cited by 2,496
Self-citation
Cited by
Competition on a Divided and Ephemeral Resource: A Simulation Model
Atkinson, W. D., & Shorrocks, B. (1981) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4067 · Cited by 426
SPECIES DIVERSITY PATTERNS DERIVED FROM SPECIES–AREA MODELS
He, F., & Legendre, P. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1185:sdpdfs]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 369
Adaptive rationality: an evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias
Haselton, M. G., Bryant, G. A., Wilke, A., Frederick, D. A., Galperin, A., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Moore, T. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.733 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, L. R., Woiwod, I. P., & Perry, J. N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1978-06
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 383
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.2307/3790
- OpenAlex
- W2332323756
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Density-Dependence of Spatial Behaviour and the Rarity of Randomness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3790
- The paper
- Taylor, L. R., Woiwod, I. P., & Perry, J. N. (1978). The Density-Dependence of Spatial Behaviour and the Rarity of Randomness. The Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/3790
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.