Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 808

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Removal Method of Population Estimation

Zippin, Calvin·1958·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

A biweekly posttreatment fish census was taken along a 5,600-foot ditch traversing the marsh; enumerations and estimates of the numbers of each species encountered were supplemented by sampling collections. The census was abandoned when progress in repopulation ended its dependability. Repopulation by fishes began slowly about 4 weeks after the kill, was undeniable at 6 weeks, considerable by 8, and climactic at 10. It was initiated by the broad killifish (Cyprinodon v. variegatus), the dominant invader, and included record minimumsized tarpon by the seventeenth week, but large-sized fish of such species as snook were absent, perhaps significantly. The general absence of dead and dying fishes and the scarcity of living fishes in the marsh after 2 weeks and later suggests that much of the fish population commuting between the marsh and adjacent inshore shallows of Indian River was destroyed. LITERATURE CITED

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3797301

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 808

Metadata

Authors
Zippin, C.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1958-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
82
ISSN
0022-541X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2332520085
Cited by
808
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Removal Method of Population Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3797301
The paper
Zippin, C. (1958). The Removal Method of Population Estimation. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3797301

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.