Cited by 176Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Spatial Relations between Sympatric Coyotes and Red Foxes in North Dakota

Sargeant, Alan B., Allen, Stephen H., Hastings, James O.·1987·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

Alan B. Sargeant, Stephen H. Allen, James O. Hastings, Spatial Relations between Sympatric Coyotes and Red Foxes in North Dakota, The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 51, No. 2 (Apr., 1987), pp. 285-293

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3801004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Red foxes have been shown to select habitats that coyotes generally avoid.

    “Red foxes Vulpes vulpes have similarly been shown to select habitats which coyotes generally avoid (Sargeant, Allen & Hastings 1987;Gosselink et al. 2003).”

    From A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes (2015) · cites this paper as Sargeant, Allen & Hastings 1987

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sargeant, A. B., Allen, S. H., & Hastings, J. O.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-04
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
285
ISSN
0022-541X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058312880
Cited by
176
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
coyote, red fox, sympatric species, spatial relations, interspecific competition, habitat use, North Dakota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review