Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Depredation of Artificial Nests

Yahner, Richard H., Scott, David P.·1988·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

Depredation on artificial ground and arboreal (1.5 m above ground) nests was studied in mature (uncut) forest stands on a ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) management area in central Pennsylvania from May to August 1986. Predation was evaluated in mature stands with zero, 25, and 50% zones of the surrounding forest fragmented by clearcutting. Nest depredation was highest in the 50% zone and least in the zero percent zone; more arboreal nests than ground nests were disturbed. American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) were major predators on nests in the 50% zone, and crows and blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) caused most nest disturbances in the 25% zone. Our results suggest that fragmentation of surrounding mature forest stands may negatively impact avian nesting success, especially when the principal nest predators are corvids. Predation in fragmented forests may have a greater effect on nesting success of birds nesting above ground than on those nesting at ground level. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 52(1):158-161 Forest fragmentation, or the cutting of remaining natural forest into progressively smaller patches (Harris 1980), negatively impacts abundance and distribution of insectivorous passerines in the eastern United States (Whitcomb et al. 1981). Because forest fragmentation results in greater edge (Ranney et al. 1981) and predators select edges for foraging (Gates and Gysel 1978, Chasko and Gates 1982), predation on avian nests could increase with extensive forest fragmentation (Noss 1983). However, with the exception of a study dealing with predation on artificial nests in woodlots of various sizes (Wilcove 1985), the influence of forest fragmentation on nest predation is not well documented. Clearcutting forest to improve ruffed grouse habitat at the Barrens Grouse Habitat Management Study Area (BGMA) in central Pennsylvania provides suitable nesting habitat for a variety of avian species that nest ?2 m from the ground (Yahner 1986b, Yahner and Cypher 1987). The BGMA contains a sector with no forest fragmentation (zero clearcutting) and sectors with 2 intensities of forest fragmentation (25 and 50% clearcutting) that provided an opportunity to examine the relationship between nest depredation and forest fragmentation. Our objective was to compare depredation on artificial ground and arboreal nests placed in mature forest stands surrounded by uncut forest and 2 intensities of forest fragmentation at the BGMA. We thank R. A. Voytko and R. W. Bond for field assistance. Funding for this study was provided by the Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation and the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station. W. A. Creed, R. G. Eckstein, and M. J. Lacki reviewed the manuscript. This is Journal Series Paper 7565 of the Agricultural Experiment Station, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3801078

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Yahner, R. H., & Scott, D. P.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1988-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
158
ISSN
0022-541X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2324760014
Cited by
234
References
0
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Depredation of Artificial Nests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3801078
The paper
Yahner, R. H., & Scott, D. P. (1988). Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Depredation of Artificial Nests. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801078

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.