The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions
Abstract
Artificial nest experiments have been used in approximately 80 recent studies to identify a wide range of factors influencing reproductive success of birds. Despite the same factors being examined in different studies, few consistent patterns have emerged from these experiments. Analysis of reproductive success at artificial and natural nests reveals that reproductive success measured with use of artificial nests is frequently underestimated. In addition, several studies suggest that different species of predators may be differentially attracted to the two types of nest. These results call the utility of artificial nests into question as a tool for elucidating factors influencing the success of natural nests. Analysis of the methodology used in artificial nest experiments reveals that in general there is poor correspondence between the appearance of experimental setups and the natural systems they attempt to model. If future experiments with artificial nests are to contribute to theory, the quality of experiments must improve and the assumptions underlying the artificial approach must be tested. Collecting this information will be relatively simple compared with the time‐consuming task of experimenting with natural nests. Until these data are collected, conclusions about nesting ecology derived from the use of artificial nest experiments should be treated as preliminary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nest Predation in Forest Tracts and the Decline of Migratory Songbirds
Wilcove, D. S. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939174 · Cited by 1,029
Predation on Ground-Nesting Birds' Nests in Relation to Predator Densities and Habitat Edge
Angelstam, P. (1986) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3565450 · Cited by 397
An Experiment On Spacing-Out as a Defence Against Predation
Tinbergen, N., Impekoven, M., & Franck, D. (1967) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853967x00064 · Cited by 386
On the advantage of being different: Nest predation and the coexistence of bird species
Martin, T. E. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.7.2196 · Cited by 293
Forest fragmentation and avian nest predation in forested landscapes
Small, M. F., & Hunter, M. L. (1988) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00379601 · Cited by 285
Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Depredation of Artificial Nests
Yahner, R. H., & Scott, D. P. (1988) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3801078 · Cited by 234
Artificial Nest Experiments: Effects of Nest Appearance and Type of Predator
Martin, T. E. (1987) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1368547 · Cited by 225
Nest Site Selection across Field-Woodland Ecotones: The Effect of Nest Predation
Møller, A. P., & Moller, A. P. (1989) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3565342 · Cited by 201
Depredation on Artificial Ground Nests: Effects of Edge and Plot Age
Yahner, R. H., & Wright, A. L. (1985) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3801563 · Cited by 193
Nest Predation Experiments with Quail Eggs: Too Much to Swallow?
Roper, J. J. (1992) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545570 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Why have birds in the woodlands of Southern Australia declined?
Ford, H. A., Barrett, G. W., Saunders, D. A., & Recher, H. F. (2001) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00101-4 · Cited by 381
Identifying predators and fates of grassland passerine nests using miniature video cameras
Pietz, P. J., & Granfors, D. A. (2000) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802976 · Cited by 337
Evidence of an Edge Effect on Avian Nest Success
BATÁRY, P., & BÁLDI, A. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00184.x · Cited by 296
Weidinger, K. (2002) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00611.x · Cited by 255
Coppedge, B. R., Talent, L. G., & Engle, D. M. (2007) · The Southwestern Naturalist · doi:10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[453:eooaas]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- MAJOR, R. E., & KENDAL, C. E.
- Venue
- Ibis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 298-307
- ISSN
- 0019-1019 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-919X
- OpenAlex
- W2090878948
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 22.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1996.tb04342.x
- The paper
- MAJOR, R. E., & KENDAL, C. E. (1996). The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions. Ibis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1996.tb04342.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.