Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identification of Cougar and Jaguar Feces through Bile Acid Chromatography

Fernandez, Gustavo J., Corley, Juan C., Capurro, Angel F.·1997·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

The use of feces for population size assessment and diet analysis of carnivore species depends on accurate feces identification. Fecal bile acid composition appears to be species specific among carnivores and therefore a useful method to identify fecal samples. To help identify 194 field-collected feces of cougars (Puma concolor) and jaguars (Felis onca), 2 sympatric carnivore species of the Chaco Region (Paraguay), we developed a method to determine feces origin using thin layer chromatography (TLC) bile acid patterns. Bile acids were extracted from 11 fecal samples from cougars and 10 from jaguars from different zoological gardens. Although cougar and jaguar feces contain the same identifiable bile acids, feces can be distinguished by the presence of a single unknown bile acid present consistently only among jaguar feces. The use of this bile acid as an indicator of feces origin, evaluated by means of 2 blind tests of 10 samples each, reached 80%. We also compared our results with a previous identification of the field collected feces based on physical characteristics. We suggest that TLC analysis of fecal bile acids is the best identification technique of cougar and jaguar feces technique available.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3802608

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fernandez, G. J., Corley, J. C., & Capurro, A. F.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1997-04
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
506
ISSN
0022-541X
Cited by
19
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review