Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Demographic Factors Contributing to High Raccoon Densities in Urban Landscapes

Prange, Suzanne, Gehrt, Stanley D., Wiggers, Ernie P.·2003·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

We simultaneously studied raccoon (Procyon lotor) populations inhabiting urban, suburban, and rural open areas in northeastern Illinois, USA, to examine the effects of urbanization on raccoon demographics. We predicted that raccoon density was higher in urbanized than rural landscapes because of increased survival and reproduction rates and greater site fidelity in urbanized areas. Density estimates for both the urban and suburban sites were greater (P < 0.001) than for the rural site during all seasons. Density estimates for the urban and suburban sites were similar (0.177 ≤ P< 0.603) during 4 of seasons. Percentages of porous females were similar among sites. However, higher proportions of juveniles to adult females captured at the urbanized sites may indicate larger litter sizes. Adult female survival was highest at the urban site during the first 2 years, but dropped due to an unknown disease during the final year. Urban raccoons experienced the fewest mortality sources, whereas rural raccoons experienced the most. Disease was the greatest mortality factor at the urban site, while vehicle-related mortalities dominated at the suburban and rural sites. The high ratio of marked to unmarked raccoons captured may indicate greater site fidelity at urbanized sites. Our data suggest that multiple factors, including increased survival, higher annual recruitment, and increased site fidelity, are jointly responsible for high-density raccoon populations in urbanized areas. Direct management of raccoon numbers in urbanized areas likely will require continuous control measures, because raccoons are capable of quickly repopulating an area after the resident population has been reduced. The most effective control measure may be the reduction of anthropogenic food sources that support raccoons at high densities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3802774

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 375

Metadata

Authors
Prange, S., Gehrt, S. D., & Wiggers, E. P.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2003-04
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
324
ISSN
0022-541X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326282781
Cited by
375
References
0
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Demographic Factors Contributing to High Raccoon Densities in Urban Landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3802774
The paper
Prange, S., Gehrt, S. D., & Wiggers, E. P. (2003). Demographic Factors Contributing to High Raccoon Densities in Urban Landscapes. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802774

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.