Cited by 71Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Condition of San Joaquin Kit Foxes in Urban and Exurban Habitats

Cypher, Brian L., Frost, Nancy·1999·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

We compared condition of endangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) between an urban population in Bakersfield, California (BAK), and a nearby exurban population at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California (NPRC). Our objective was to determine whether differences between urban and exurban environments, particularly food availability and disease vectors, were reflected in kit fox condition. Body mass, blood chemistry, and prevalence of viral antibodies were assessed at both sites in 1988 and 1989. Body mass was higher for BAK kit foxes, particularly juveniles, and varied between years for NPRC kit foxes. Higher red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) among NPRC kit foxes were indicative of hemoconcentration, probably resulting from dehydration associated with low food or water intake. Kit foxes from NPRC exhibited higher blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and lower cholesterol (CHOL) levels compared to BAK kit foxes. These results may have reflected dietary differences, but they possibly indicated tissue catabolism by NPRC kit foxes due to nutritional deprivation. Other serological data also suggested nutritional stress among NPRC kit foxes. Prevalence of antibodies to canine parvovirus (CPV), canine distemper (CD), and infectious canine hepatitus (ICH) was similar between populations. Food availability for kit foxes at NPRC was relatively low during 1988-89 due to drought cond…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3802807

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kit foxes in urban areas in California show less nutritional stress, increased body condition, and improved immune function compared to foxes in a nearby nature reserve.

    “Kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) in urban areas in California show less nutritional stress, increased body condition, and improved immune function when compared to foxes in a nearby nature reserve (Cypher and Frost 1999).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Cypher and Frost 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cypher, B. L., & Frost, N.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1999-07
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
930
ISSN
0022-541X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2325291658
Cited by
71
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • California State University, Bakersfield
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
San Joaquin kit fox, Vulpes macrotis mutica, urban habitat, body condition, body mass, hemoconcentration, dehydration, nutritional stress, serum biochemistry, viral antibodies, canine parvovirus, canine distemper, infectious canine hepatitis, food availability, drought, endangered species conservation, Bakersfield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review