Muskoxen and Their Hunters: A History
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grizzly bears are a more important predator than wolves in northeastern Alaska.
“Grizzly bears are a more important predator than wolves in northeastern Alaska (Reynolds et al. 2002).”
From Muskox status, recent variation, and uncertain future (2020) · cites this paper as Reynolds et al. 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muskox status, recent variation, and uncertain future
Cuyler, C., Rowell, J., Adamczewski, J., Anderson, M., Blake, J., Bretten, T., Brodeur, V., Campbell, M., Checkley, S. L., Cluff, H. D., et al. (2020) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01205-x · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of grizzly bear predation on muskoxen in northeastern Alaska
Arthur, S. M., & Vecchio, P. A. D. (2017) · Ursus · doi:10.2192/ursu-d-16-00023.1 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reynolds, P. E., & Lent, P. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 546
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082370530
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › American Environmental and Regional History
- Keywords
- Ovibos moschatus, hunting history, human-wildlife interactions, subsistence hunting, Arctic fauna
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
