Cited by 2Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

Ramose Restored: A Royal Prince and His Mortuary Cult

Snape, S. R.·1985·The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology

Abstract

Une statue fragmentaire assise, en granit (Liverpool SAOS E 609), au nom du fils royal Ramose et dediee par le pretre du Ka Kaheri (debut 18 Dynastie) est le vestige d'un culte rendu a ce prince dans la chapelle de Ouadjmes, restaure sous Ramses II (sa representation est visible dans la tombe de Khabekhenet a Deir el-Medineh). Il aurait vecu durant les 17 et 18 Dynasties

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3821728

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snape, S. R.
Corresponding author
Snape, S. R.
Venue
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1985
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
180
ISSN
0307-5133 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2465354383
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
Ramose, mortuary cult, royal princes, Eighteenth Dynasty, 19th Dynasty, Deir el-Medina, tomb restoration, Ramesses II, funerary chapel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review