Cited by 5Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyAncient Near East HistoryClassical Antiquity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regnal Years and Civil Calendar in Achaemenid Egypt

Depuydt, Leo·1995·The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology

Abstract

This paper describes ancient Egyptian regnal and calendar dating in the Twenty-seventh Dynasty or First Persian Period, reviewing the evidence from Aramaic, cuneiform, Demotic Egyptian, Greek, and hieroglyphic Egyptian sources. A table listing the Egyptian regnal years of Persian kings is appended.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3821813

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Depuydt, L.
Corresponding author
Depuydt, Leo
Venue
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
151
ISSN
0307-5133 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2499696352
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
regnal years, civil calendar, Achaemenid Egypt, Persian kings, Egyptian chronology, Aramaic inscriptions, cuneiform, Greek inscriptions, hieroglyphic inscriptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review