The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Ecological Theory on Foraging Time and Energetics and Choice of Optimal Food-Searching Method
Abstract
In the past few years there has been much theoretical work on optimal foraging behaviour in animals. It relates to the assumption that animals tend to optimize their feeding activities. Reviews appear in Schoener (1971), MacArthur (1972), Emlen (1973) and Pianka (1974). Interest has been paid particularly to optimal choice of diet for predators with a choice among different prey types (Charnov 1976a; Emlen 1966, 1968, 1975; MacArthur 1972; MacArthur & Pianka 1966; Marten 1973; Pulliam 1974; Rapport 1971; Schoener 1969a, 1969b, 1971, 1974), to strategies of movement and to exploitation of different habitat patches (Charnov 1976b; Emlen 1973; Krebs, Ryan & Charnov 1974; MacArthur & Pianka 1966; Royama 1970; Schoener 1974; Smith 1974a, b; Smith & Dawkins 1971; Tullock 1970). Interest has also been focused on relations between various features of morphology, energetics of foraging, and feeding strategies (e.g. Feinsinger & Chaplin 1975; Gill & Wolf 1975; Hainsworth & Wolf 1972a, b, 1975; Heinrich & Raven 1972; Wolf, Hainsworth & Stiles 1972; Wolf, Stiles & Hainsworth 1976). Various components of the time expenditure for foraging were considered by Holling (1965, 1968) in constructing models on functional response of predators to density of their prey (see also the recent reviews by Hassell, Lawton & Beddington (1976) and Beddington, Hassell & Lawton (1976)). The present approach differs from those of earlier papers in that particular emphasis is laid here on the energy cost of locomotion during foraging and its effect on the foraging time. One possible goal is to construct a general mathematical model of foraging time and energetics. The moment an animal starts to move about in search of food to cover its energy needs, it suffers an extra energy drainage that must also be replaced. Thus, for example, the energy cost of locomotion for foraging of some birds may readily come up to 5-10 times the basal metabolic rate. Luckily, the energetic cost of foraging is usually easily outweighed by the energy gains. However, this is not always necessarily so. When food density decreases, an animal has to spend progressively more time searching for food, and it may at times have difficulty finding enough time to cover its energy budget. If it were to continue with the same foraging technique it would eventually find it difficult even to make foraging gains catch up with energy losses due to foraging activities, let alone provide also the energy required for non-foraging periods. In this paper, I want to assess the consequences to an animal of the energy and time expenditures for foraging. Further, I will explore whether or not an animal may gain a selective advantage by employing different search methods in different seasons in a fluctuating environment. More precisely, I look for answers to the following main questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
Cited by
Ecological Consequences of Foraging Mode
Huey, R. B., & Pianka, E. R. (1981) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936998 · Cited by 1,079
Metadata
- Authors
- Norberg, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 511
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.2307/3827
- OpenAlex
- W2325022328
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Ecological Theory on Foraging Time and Energetics and Choice of Optimal Food-Searching Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3827
- The paper
- Norberg, R. A. (1977). An Ecological Theory on Foraging Time and Energetics and Choice of Optimal Food-Searching Method. The Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/3827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.