The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological Consequences of Foraging Mode
Abstract
Desert lizards are typically either widely foraging or sit—and—wait predators, and these foraging modes are correlated with major differences in ecology. Foraging mode is related to the type of prey eaten by lizards. Widely foraging lizards in the Kalahari desert, the Western Australian desert, and the North American desert generally eat more prey that are sedentary, unpredictably distributed, and clumped (e.g., termites) or that are large and inaccessible (inactive scorpions) than do sit—and—wait lizards. In contrast, sit—and—wait lizards eat more prey that are active. Foraging mode also appears to influence the types of predators that in turn eat the lizards. For example, a sit—and—wait snake eats predominately widely foraging lizards. Crossovers in foraging mode thus exist between trophic levels. Widely foraging lizards may also encounter predators more frequently, as suggested by analyses of relative tail lengths; but tail break frequencies are ambiguous. Daily maintenance energetic expenditures of widely foraging lizards appear to be about 1.3—1.5 times greater than those of sit—and—wait lizards in the same habitats, but gross food gains are about 1.3—2.1 times greater. Widely foraging species also have lower relative clutch volumes, apparently in response to enhanced risks of predation. Foraging mode within one species varies with changes in food availability. Physiology, morphology, and risk of predation might generally restrict the flexibility of foraging mode. Because foraging mode constrains numerous important aspects of ecology, any general model of foraging velocity must be complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schoener, T. W. (1971) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002101 · Cited by 3,572
Analysis of Ecological Systems.
Milner, C., Horn, D. J., Mitchell, R. D., & Stairs, G. R. (1980) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402978 · Cited by 551
Convexity, Desert Lizards, and Spatial Heterogeneity
Pianka, E. R. (1966) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1935656 · Cited by 428
Self-citationAn Ecological Theory on Foraging Time and Energetics and Choice of Optimal Food-Searching Method
Norberg, R. A. (1977) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3827 · Cited by 298
Sceloporus Undulatus: A Study of the Intraspecific Comparative Demography of a Lizard
Tinkle, D. W., & Ballinger, R. Ε. (1972) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1934772 · Cited by 295
Tail autotomy, functional conflicts and their resolution by a salamander
Maiorana, V. C. (1977) · Nature · doi:10.1038/265533a0 · Cited by 141
The metabolic responses of the common iguana, Iguana iguana, to activity under restraint
Moberly, W. R. (1968) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1016/0010-406x(68)90749-4 · Cited by 140
Evolution of Escape Behavior Diversity
Pianka, E. R. (1980) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283579 · Cited by 140
Self-citationEnergy Expenditure in Free‐Ranging Lizards
Bennett, A. F., & Nagy, K. A. (1977) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939022 · Cited by 134
The Adaptive Syndromes of Two Guilds of Insectivorous Birds in the Colorado Rocky Mountains
Eckhardt, R. C. (1979) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942510 · Cited by 134
Cited by
Werner, E. E., & Anholt, B. R. (1993) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285537 · Cited by 1,081
PREDATOR DIVERSITY AND TROPHIC INTERACTIONS
Schmitz, O. J. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-0937.1 · Cited by 485
Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals?
Straub, C. S., Finke, D. L., & Snyder, W. E. (2008) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.05.013 · Cited by 381
Capital versus Income Breeding: An Ectothermic Perspective
Bonnet, X., Bradshaw, D., & Shine, R. (1998) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546846 · Cited by 371
History and the Global Ecology of Squamate Reptiles
Vitt, L. J., Pianka, E. R., Cooper, Jr., & Schwenk, K. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/375172 · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huey, R. B., & Pianka, E. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-08
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 991-999
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2052590786
- Cited by
- 1,079
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 17.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological Consequences of Foraging Mode. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936998
- The paper
- Huey, R. B., & Pianka, E. R. (1981). Ecological Consequences of Foraging Mode. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.