The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Chronology of Great Zimbabwe
Abstract
A series of 21 radiocarbon dates are now available for Great Zimbabwe. Within the limits of the technique, this series provides precise chronological criteria for interpreting the sequence of occupations at this famous site. The main occupation of the Zimbabwe culture, the one associated with the stone walls, can be bracketed to a two hundred year period, ending in the mid-fifteenth century.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Almost all radiocarbon dates for Great Zimbabwe came from walled settlements.
“Of particular concern was that almost all these dates (barring a few, see Huffman and Vogel 1991) came from walled settlements.”
From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Huffman and Vogel 1991
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe
Chirikure, S. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-019-09133-w · Cited by 35
Penn, A., & Turner, J. S. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0253 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Huffman, T. N., & Vogel, J. C.
- Venue
- The South African Archaeological Bulletin
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 154
- Pages
- 61
- ISSN
- 0038-1969
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
