Cited by 3,016American Environmental and Regional HistoryEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsEcocriticism and Environmental Literature

The Trouble with Wilderness: Or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature

Cronon, William·1996·Environmental History

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3985059

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cronon, W.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Cronon, William
Venue
Environmental History
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
7-28
ISSN
  • 1084-5453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-8892
OpenAlex
W1981622821
Cited by
3,016
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 121 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 192 · 2023: 208 · 2022: 262 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 180 · 2018: 178 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 101
FWCI
46.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › American Environmental and Regional History
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Keywords
wilderness, nature, conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review