The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Viewpoint: Sustainability of Pinon-Juniper Ecosystems: A Unifying Perspective of Soil Erosion Thresholds
Abstract
Many piñon-juniper ecosystems in the western U.S. are subject to accelerated erosion while others are undergoing little or no erosion. Controversy has developed over whether invading or encroaching piñon and juniper species are inherently harmful to rangeland ecosystems. We developed a conceptual model of soil erosion in piñon-juniper ecosystems that is consistent with both sides of the controversy and suggests that the diverse perspectives on this issue arise from threshold effects operating under very different site conditions. Soil erosion rate can be viewed as a function of (1) site erosion potential (SEP), determined by climate, geomorphology and soil erodibility; and (2) ground cover. Site erosion potential and cover act synergistically to determine soil erosion rates, as evident even from simple USLE predictions of erosion. In piñon-juniper ecosystems with high SEP, the erosion rate is highly sensitive to ground cover and can cross a threshold so that erosion increases dramatically in response to a small decrease in cover. The sensitivity of erosion rate to SEP and cover can be visualized as a cusp catastrophe surface on which changes may occur rapidly and irreversibly. The mechanisms associated with a rapid shift from low to high erosion rate can be illustrated using percolation theory to incorporate spatial, temporal, and scale-dependent patterns of water storage capacity on a hillslope. Percolation theory demonstrates how hillslope runoff can undergo a threshold response to a minor change in storage capacity. Our conceptual model suggests that piñon and juniper contribute to accelerated erosion only under a limited range of site conditions which, however, may exist over large areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Martens, S. N., Breshears, D. D., Meyer, C. W., & Barnes, F. J. (1997) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3237370 · Cited by 101
Self-citation
Cited by
McDowell, N., Pockman, W. T., Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D., Cobb, N., Kolb, T., Plaut, J., Sperry, J., West, A., Williams, D. G., et al. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x · Cited by 4,472
Self-citationAllen, C. D., Breshears, D. D., & McDowell, N. G. (2015) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es15-00203.1 · Cited by 2,642
Self-citationCurrent research issues related to post-wildfire runoff and erosion processes
Moody, J. A., Shakesby, R. A., Robichaud, P. R., Cannon, S. H., & Martin, D. A. (2013) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.03.004 · Cited by 693
Ecohydrology of water‐limited environments: A scientific vision
Newman, B. D., Wilcox, B. P., Archer, S. R., Breshears, D. D., Dahm, C. N., Duffy, C. J., McDowell, N. G., Phillips, F. M., Scanlon, B. R., & Vivoni, E. R. (2006) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2005wr004141 · Cited by 512
Self-citationSaving the sagebrush sea: An ecosystem conservation plan for big sagebrush plant communities
Davies, K. W., Boyd, C. S., Beck, J. L., Bates, J. D., Svejcar, T. J., & Gregg, M. A. (2011) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.016 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Davenport, D. W., Breshears, D. D., Wilcox, B. P., & Allen, C. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Range Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231
- ISSN
- 0022-409X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W196579209
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Viewpoint: Sustainability of Pinon-Juniper Ecosystems: A Unifying Perspective of Soil Erosion Thresholds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/4003212
- The paper
- Davenport, D. W., Breshears, D. D., Wilcox, B. P., & Allen, C. D. (1998). Viewpoint: Sustainability of Pinon-Juniper Ecosystems: A Unifying Perspective of Soil Erosion Thresholds. Journal of Range Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.