CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Place of Origin of Prehistoric Inhabitants of Aztalan, Jefferson Co., Wisconsin

Price, T. Douglas, Burton, James H., Stoltman, James B.·2007·American Antiquity
DOI 10.2307/40035859
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The archaeological site of Aztalan in southeastern Wisconsin is a large, palisaded complex of mounds and other structures along the banks of the Crawfish River in Jefferson County. The unusual nature of this settlement has been noted for many years and the origin of the inhabitants has been the subject of considerable debate. The similarities between the materials at Aztalan and other Mississippian period sites to the south in Illinois have long been noted. The largest center of the Mississippian culture at Cahokia near East St. Louis, Illinois, has often been cited as the likely home of the founders of Aztalan. Using strontium isotopes in human teeth and bone we examine the question of migration and the possibility of nonlocal individuals among the skeletal remains from Aztalan. Our results suggest that there were a number of foreign individuals among the locals. The isotopic signal for some of the foreigners matches values from Cahokia, but does not prove that this was their place of origin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/40035859

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Hurley, 1977, Aztalan Revisited, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 58, 256
  2. 10.1007/s10814-004-0001-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/1461957104047992 · DOI
  4. Stoltman, 1991, New Perspectives on Cahokia: Views from the Periphery
  5. Ritzenthaler, 1963, Radiocarbon Dates for Aztalan, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 44, 18
  6. Hendrickson, 1996, Late Woodland and Middle Mississippian Interaction at the Bethesda Lutheran Home Site (47Je201), Jefferson County, Wisconsin, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 77, 11
  7. Faure, 1986, Principles of Isotope Geology
  8. Goldstein, 1991, New Perspectives on Cahokia: Views from the Periphery, 209
  9. Baerreis, 1958, Late Woodland Pottery in Wisconsin as Seen From Aztalan, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 39, 35
  10. Borman, 1975, Ground-water Resources and Geology of Jefferson County, Wisconsin
  11. 10.1038/scientificamerican0875-92 · DOI
  12. Price, 1982, Bone Composition and the Reconstruction of Diet: Examples from the Midwestern United States, Mid-continental Journal of Archaeology, 7, 61
  13. Milfred, 197, Soils of Jefferson County, Wisconsin.
  14. Hall, 1986, Upper Mississippi and Middle Mississippi Relationships, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 67, 365
  15. Parmalee, 1960, Animal Remains from the Aztalan site, Jefferson County, Wisconsin, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 41, 1
  16. Ritzenthaler, 1961, Radiocarbon Dates for Aztalan, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 42, 139
  17. Goldstein, 1997, Aztalan: A Middle Mississippian Village, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 78, 223
  18. 10.1006/jasc.1999.0504 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00208-2 · DOI
  20. 10.1086/344373 · DOI
  21. Rowe, 1958, A Crematorium at Aztalan, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 39, 101
  22. Finney Fred A. 200. Exchange and risk management in the upper Mississippi River Valley, A.D. 1000–120. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology*
  23. Gibbon, 1979, Mississippian Sites in the Red Wing Area.
  24. 10.1111/1475-4754.00047 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Barrett, 1933, Ancient Aztalan
  26. Tiffany, 1982, Hartley Fort Ceramics, Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 89, 133
  27. Hall, 1962, The Archaeology of Carcajou Point
  28. 10.1179/146195700807860828 · DOI
  29. Baerreis, 1965, Climatic Episodes and the Dating of the Mississippian Cultures, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 46, 203
  30. Emerson, 1991, Cahokia and the Hinterlands: Middle Mississippian Cultures of the Midwest
  31. Richards, 2003, Collars, Castellations, and Cahokia: A Regional Perspective on the Aztalan Ceramic Assemblage, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 84, 139
  32. Gallagher, 1992, Late Prehistoric Agriculture: Observations from the Midwest, 95
  33. Whitson, 1916, Soil Survey of Jefferson County Wisconsin
  34. Goldstein, 2002, Recasting the Past: Examining Assumptions About Aztalan, Current Issues in the Archaeology of the Western Great Lakes: Problems and Progress, 83, 98
  35. 10.1017/S0003598X00064693 · DOI
  36. Anderson, 1994, The Aztalan Site: A Human Skeletal Inventory and Excavation History
  37. Birmingham, 2005, Aztalan. Mysteries of an Ancient Indian Town
  38. 10.2307/280213 · DOI
  39. 10.2307/276244 · DOI
  40. Richards, 1992, Ceramics and Culture at Aztalan, a late Prehistoric Village in Southeastern Wisconsin
  41. Wittry, 1958, Domestic houses at Aztalan, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 39, 62
  42. 10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00347-7 · DOI
  43. Baerreis, 1958, Aztalan revisited: An introduction, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 39, 2
  44. Freeman, 1986, Aztalan: A Middle Mississippian Village, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 67, 339
  45. Stoltman, 1991, New Perspective on Cahokia: Views from the Periphery, 349
  46. 10.1006/jasc.1994.1031 · DOI
  47. 10.1006/jasc.1998.0293 · DOI
  48. Stoltman, 1986, Prehistoric Mound Builders of the Mississippi Valley, 26
  49. Young, 2000, Cahokia: The Great Native American Metropolis
  50. Johnson, 2003, Description and Analysis of Preserved Fabrics from the Northwest Mound at Aztalan: A Late Prehistoric Site in Southeastern Wisconsin
  51. 10.1006/jasc.1996.0129 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00069-4 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1520/JFS14829J · DOI
  54. Finney, 1991, New Perspectives on Cahokia: Views from the Periphery, 229
  55. Richards, 2002, Location, Location, Location: The Temporal and Cultural Context of Late Prehistoric Settlement in Southwest Wisconsin, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 83, 32
  56. 10.1017/CBO9781139170697 · DOI
  57. Montgomery, 1999, Metals in Antiquity, 258
  58. Hall, 1967, The Mississippian Heartland and Its Plains Relationships, Plains Anthropologist, 12, 175, 10.1080/2052546.1967.11908453 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/0012-821X(89)90003-4 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/0305-4403(91)90074-Y · DOI
  61. 10.1007/978-3-642-65367-4 · DOI
  62. Stoltman, 2000, Mounds, Modoc, and Mesoamerica: Papers in Honor of Melvin L. Fowler, 439
  63. Goldstein, 1991, Cahokia and the Hinterlands: Middle Mississippian Cultures of the Midwest
  64. 10.1016/0883-2927(94)90063-9 · DOI
  65. Rodell, 2003, Spheres of Interaction and Late Prehistory in the Northern Mississippi Valley, The Wisconsin Archeologist, 84, 181
  66. Goldstein, 1991, New perspectives on Cahokia: views from the peripheries
  67. Boszhardt, 2004, The Late Woodland and Middle Mississippian Component at the Iva Site, La Crosse County, Wisconsin in the Driftless Area of the Upper Mississippi River Valley, The Minnesota Archaeologist, 63, 60

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Price, T. D., Burton, J. H., & Stoltman, J. B.
Venue
American Antiquity
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2007-07
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
524-538
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
DOI
10.2307/40035859
Cited by
61
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 3491 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review