The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Racism without racists : color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As Bonilla-Silva (2006) found, there are purposeful rhetorical moves employed to avoid the discourse of race, racism, and racial inequities and maintain white supremacy.”
From Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society (2017) · cites this paper as Bonilla-Silva 2006
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Krieger, N., Smith, K., Naishadham, D., Hartman, C., & Barbeau, E. M. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.006 · Cited by 1,704
Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability
Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511 · Cited by 1,272
Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time
Quillian, L., Pager, D., Hexel, O., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1706255114 · Cited by 887
Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P. G., Ditlmann, R., & Crosby, J. R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615 · Cited by 786
The persistent problem of colorism: skin tone, status, and inequality
Hunter, M. (2007) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00006.x · Cited by 763
Metadata
- Authors
- Shin, H., & Bonilla-Silva, E.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 652
- ISSN
- 0039-8322
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
