The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Grouping Conditions in Listening to Music: An Approach to Lerdahl & Jackendoff's Grouping Preference Rules
Abstract
Lerdahl and Jackendoff propose a grouping theory that can apply to both the global and the local structures of the process of listening to music. It is a set of rules expressing the intuitive organization of groups in music perception. The "proximity rules" describe the length differences and the "change rules" describe the modifications in the acoustic or temporal state of sound structures, in relation to Gestalt Theory. As such, they propose a testable hypothesis on certain aspects of music perception. Two experiments are reported, which do not go beyond segmentation into two levels of grouping. They compare the grouping behavior of two categories of subjects, nonmusicians and musicians. Four questions are raised: (1) Do the segmentations reported by subjects answer in all respects the predictions of the rules? (2) Are they available to both categories of subjects? (3) Do they cover all grouping situations in music? (4) Are they of equal perceptual salience? The first experiment used material taken from compositions in the Western art music repertoire (Bach to Stravinsky). The second one put the rules in conflict in simple melodic sequences, where a combination of all possible conflicts between pairs of rules was designed. The results show the validity of the rules. Nonmusicians had poorer performances with repertoire music sequences. Yet the two categories of subjects do not show a radically different grouping behavior. New rules are suggested by the segmentations that were not in accordance with the theory. They also show some difficulties for the length rules deriving from the Gestalt Similarity law.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology
(2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426 · Cited by 1,632
Expectation in Melody: The Influence of Context and Learning
Pearce, M. T., & Wiggins, G. A. (2006) · Music Perception · doi:10.1525/mp.2006.23.5.377 · Cited by 297
Problem-Solving Strategies in Music Composition: A Case Study
McADAMS, S. (2004) · Music Perception · doi:10.1525/mp.2004.21.3.391 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Deliege, I.
- Venue
- Music Perception
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 325-359
- ISSN
- 0730-7829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069396202
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grouping Conditions in Listening to Music: An Approach to Lerdahl & Jackendoff's Grouping Preference Rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/40285378
- The paper
- Deliege, I. (1987). Grouping Conditions in Listening to Music: An Approach to Lerdahl & Jackendoff's Grouping Preference Rules. Music Perception. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.