Cited by 42Animal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behaviorAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Dominant Red Junglefowl (Gallus Gallus) Hens in an Unconfined Flock Rear the Most Young over Their Lifetime

Open access
Collias, Nicholas, Jennrich, Robert I.·1994·The Auk

Abstract

The evolutionary success of individuals must ultimately be evaluated in terms of their lifetime contribution of mature young to the breeding population. The greater lifetime breeding success of the more dominant hens in an unconfined flock of Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) gave crucial evidence why female dominance hierarchies have evolved in this species. The number of chicks reared to independence by 28 hens of one flock from 1982 to 1988 was significantly associated with a hen's dominance, life-span, and year of hatching. Of these, dominance was by far the most important factor. It, by itself, could explain differences in the number of chicks reared as shown by log-linear analysis. This suggests that the associations with life-span and year of hatching may result from the fact that these are correlated with dominance. The top 3 hens in the peck order added more offspring of breeding age to the population than did the remaining 25 adult hens of the flock. Eleven of the 28 hens reared no young successfully.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/4088818

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The contrast between the lifespan of the ancestral red jungle fowl and that of broilers means that the potential rate of carcass accumulation of chickens is unprecedented in the natural world.

    “The contrast between the lifespan of the ancestral red jungle fowl (3 years [46] to 11 years (Tommaso Pizzari 2018, personal communication) in captivity) and that of broilers means that the potential rate of carcass accumulation of chickens is unprecedented in the natural world.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. ALLEE, W. C., A. E. EMERSON, O. PARK, T. PARK, AND K. P. SCHMIDT. 1949. Principles of animal ecol ogy. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
  2. COLLIAS, N. E. 1950. Hormones and behavior with special reference to birds and to the mechanisms of hormone action. Pages 277-329 in Steroid hor- mones (E. S. Gordon, Ed.). Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison.
  3. LINT, K.C. 1971. Jungle fowl and their importance to man. Zoonooz 44(8):6-11.
  4. SCHJELDERuP-E1313E, T. 1922. Beitr•ige zur Sozialpsy- chologie des Haushuhns. Z. Psychol. 88:225-252. Reprinted 1975, plus English translation, pages 35-49 in Social hierarchy and dominance (M. W. Schein, Ed.). Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.
  5. COLLIAS, COLLIAS, AND JENNRICH [Auk, Vol. 1 1
  6. COLLIAS, N. E. 1950. Hormones and behavior with special reference to birds and to the mechanisms of hormone action. Pages 277-329 in Steroid hor mones (E. S. Gordon, Ed.). Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison.
  7. CRAWFORD, R . D . 1990. Origin and history o f poultry species. Pages 1-41 in Poultry breeding and ge netics (R. D. Crawford, Ed.). Elsevier, Amster dam.
  8. GUHL, A. M. 1962. The behaviour of chickens. Pages 491-530 in The behaviour of domestic animals (E. S. E. Hafez, Ed.). Balliere, Tindall and Cox, Lon don. GUHL, A. M., AND W. C. ALLEE. 1944. Some measur able effects of social organization in flocks of hens. Physiol. Zool. 17:320-347.
  9. HUTT, F. B. 1949. Genetics of the fowl. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
  10. LINT, K. C. 197 1 . Jungle fowl and their importance to man. Zoonooz 44(8):6-1 1 .
  11. SIEGEL, P. B., AND E. A. DUNNINGTON. 1990. Behav ioral genetics. Pages 877-895 in Poultry breeding and genetics (R. D. Crawford, Ed.). Elsevier, Am sterdam.
  12. Genetics and evolution of the do mestic fowl. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collias, N., & Jennrich, R. I.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Auk
Published
1994-10
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
863-872
ISSN
  • 0004-8038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-4254
OpenAlex
W2330925695
Cited by
42
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Auk (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, lifetime reproductive success, clutch size, offspring production, lifespan, evolutionary success

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review