The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental Product Differentiation: Implications for Corporate Strategy
Abstract
Political demands for environmental improvement create obligations for managers that can conflict with shareholder value creation. While differentiating products along environmental lines is a conceptually straightforward way of reconciling these apparently conflicting demands, not all attempts to do so have succeeded. This article describes three requirements for successful environmental product differentiation. Firms must discover or create a willingness in consumers to pay for public goods; they must overcome barriers to the dissemination of credible information about the environmental attributes of their products; and they must defend themselves against imitation. More broadly, environmental strategy must be integrated with the overall strategy of the business. The appropriate environmental strategy depends, like the business's overall strategy, on the fundamental economics of the industry and the business's internal capabilities—basic constraints that have often been obscured in the academic debate about business and the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications*
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x · Cited by 3,154
Flammer, C. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038 · Cited by 1,949
Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence
Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004 · Cited by 1,031
How firms respond to being rated
Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.840 · Cited by 547
Hsu, C.-L., Chang, C.-Y., & Yansritakul, C. (2017) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.006 · Cited by 539
Hsu, K.-T. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1118-0 · Cited by 430
Consequences of “greenwashing”: Consumers’ reactions to hotels’ green initiatives
Rahman, I., Park, J., & Chi, C. G.-Q. (2015) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-04-2014-0202 · Cited by 357
Supply Loops and Their Constraints: The Industrial Ecology of Recycling and Reuse
Geyer, R., & Jackson, T. (2004) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166210 · Cited by 281
Re‐evaluating green marketing strategy: a stakeholder perspective
Rivera‐Camino, J. (2007) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560710821206 · Cited by 270
The impact of human resource management on corporate social performance strengths and concerns
Rothenberg, S., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315586594 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinhardt, F. L.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 43-73
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W2136938669
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.