The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nobody Ever Gets Credit for Fixing Problems That Never Happened: Creating and Sustaining Process Improvement
Abstract
Today's managers face a paradox. On the one hand, the number of tools, techniques, and technologies available to improve operational performance is growing rapidly. On the other hand, despite dramatic success in a few companies, most efforts to use them fail to produce significant results. To understand and resolve this paradox, this article investigates the difficulties organizations face in implementing processes and techniques such as lean production, TQM, computer-aided design and development tools, stage-gate product development processes, and improved customer service systems. The inability of most organizations to reap the full benefit of these innovations has little to do with the specific technique. Instead, the problem has its roots in how the introduction of a new improvement effort interacts with the physical, economic, social, and psychological structures in which implementation takes place. This article presents a framework to understand how these failures arise and illustrates strategies for overcoming the pathological behaviors through case studies of successful improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421 · Cited by 1,116
Sustainability: the elusive element of process improvement
Bateman, N. (2005) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570510581862 · Cited by 265
Collins, R. D., de Neufville, R., Claro, J., Oliveira, T., & Pacheco, A. P. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.033 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Repenning, N. P., & Sterman, J. D.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 64-88
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W2170003151
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nobody Ever Gets Credit for Fixing Problems That Never Happened: Creating and Sustaining Process Improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/41166101
- The paper
- Repenning, N. P., & Sterman, J. D. (2001). Nobody Ever Gets Credit for Fixing Problems That Never Happened: Creating and Sustaining Process Improvement. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.