Organizational Blueprints for Success in High-Tech Start-Ups: Lessons from the Stanford Project on Emerging Companies
Abstract
This longitudinal study examines nearly 200 high-technology start-ups in California's Silicon Valley, from 1994-2001. Evaluating interviews with founders and CEOs, the authors found that work and employment blueprints depended on variables such as: attachment, coordination/control, and selection. Using these three dimensions, a typology of employment blueprints consisting of the following five models: star, engineering, commitment, bureaucracy, and autocracy or direct control, is determined. Findings indicate that organizational blueprints vary among venture-based companies, and that changes occur from one pure model type to another, which, in turn, cause changes in senior management start-ups. The results of the research suggest that founders' employment models cause long-lasting effects on the company's endurance and performance; also, changes in organizational blueprints are destabilizing to young technology start-ups. The authors conclude by suggesting lessons for entrepreneurs and managers. (CBS)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The employment blueprint founders install early proves remarkably sticky, and changing it later is costly in turnover and survival terms.
“That blueprint proves remarkably sticky, and changing it later is costly in turnover and survival terms [4,5].”
From Borrowed Competence: When AI-Driven HR Builds Startups’ People Capability and When It Hollows It Out (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion
Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.40633190 · Cited by 1,922 · see citing works
From strategic goals to business model innovation paths: An exploratory study
Heikkilä, M., Bouwman, H., & Heikkilä, J. (2018) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-03-2017-0097 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Understanding the impact of technology on firms' business models”
André Cavalcante, S. (2013) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-10-2011-0085 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Borrowed Competence: When AI-Driven HR Builds Startups’ People Capability and When It Hollows It Out
Ben Oz, R., Granot, N., Tzabbar, D., & Tzafrir, S. (2026) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7489654
- Authors
- Baron, J. N., & Hannan, M. T.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 8-36
- ISSN
- 0008-1256
- 2162-8564
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review