Cited by 52Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategies and InnovationDigital Innovation in Industries

“Understanding the impact of technology on firms' business models”

Open access
André Cavalcante, Sérgio·2013·European Journal of Innovation Management

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the impact of a new global positioning technology on firms’ business models. Design/methodology/approach The empirical setting was a consortium of Danish organizations, established to develop a positioning‐based technology platform as a basis for innovative commercial products and/or services. Three of the consortium companies were selected for case‐study research. Findings The main findings were that companies will use the new technology to extend their existing business models, and that the technology platform potentially represents the creation of a new business model for the partner companies in the consortium. Practical implications This paper is important in that it will help companies understand technological impact from a business model perspective, thereby enabling them to manage innovation better by distinguishing between the creation, extension, revision or termination of business models. Originality/value The main contribution of this study is its use of the business model perspective to analyse the impact of an emergent technology on companies’ innovation activities. This perspective makes it easier to develop strategic initiatives while managing innovation, and underlines the importance of purposive human action in adopting a proactive behaviour, reducing deterministic views on technological impact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ejim-10-2011-0085

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BM experimentation is researching technical challenges and performing new practices, while BM learning is acquiring new knowledge, discussing new ideas, and contacting and interacting with others.

    “Cavalcante (2013) distinguishes experimentation from learning, defining BM experimentation as researching technical challenges and performing new practices, and BM learning as acquiring new knowledge, discussing new ideas, and contacting and interacting with others, for example, new business partners.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
André Cavalcante, S.
Venue
European Journal of Innovation Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2013-07-26
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
285-300
ISSN
1460-1060 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059511682
Cited by
52
References
36
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
Keywords
business models, positioning technology, technology platforms, emerging technologies, innovation management, business model generation, technology adoption, strategic innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review