The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Troubling National Discourses in Anti-Racist Curricular Planning
Open accessAbstract
The narrative of the Canadian prairie context is invested in intercultural relations that privilege whiteness and marginalize Aboriginal people and other racial minorities. We maintain that anti‐oppressive curriculum on the Canadian prairies must examine how racial identifications are constructed through commonplace national discourses. A curriculum that is anti‐oppressive needs to examine the production of racial identifications, including the construction of whiteness in a Canadian context, where racism often exists in denial. Without a critical race analysis, the “celebration of diversity” and other popular narratives have every possibility of reinforcing relations of domination. Key words: anti‐oppressive education, Aboriginal education, critical whiteness studies Les textes au sujet des Prairies canadiennes font surtout état de relations interculturelles qui privilégient les Blancs et marginalisent les peuples autochtones et les autres minorités ethnoculturelles. Selon les auteures, il faut analyser le mode de construction des identités ethnoculturelles à travers les discours nationaux très répandus. Un programme scolaire qui se veut antioppressif doit tenir compte du processus de production identitaire, notamment chez les eurocanadiens où le racisme existe souvent, même s’il est nié. Sans une analyse critique portant sur l’identité ethnoculturelle, la promotion de la diversité et les autres discours populaires risquent fort de renforcer les relations de domination. Mots…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“I argue that the majority of teachers, like the majority of Canadians, have a limited understanding of Aboriginal people, history, and culture; rather their understanding is informed by dominant discourses (see Schick & St Denis, 2005).”
From Disrupting Molded Images: Identities, responsibilities and relationships—teachers and indigenous subject material (2007) · cites this paper as Schick & St Denis, 2005
In the citing paper
“I argue that the majority of teachers, like the majority of Canadians, have a limited understanding of Aboriginal people, history, and culture; rather their understanding is informed by dominant discourses (see Schick & St Denis, 2005).”
From Disrupting Molded Images: Identities, responsibilities and relationships—teachers and indigenous subject material (2007) · cites this paper as Schick & St Denis, 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dion, S. D. (2007) · Teaching Education · doi:10.1080/10476210701687625 · Cited by 154
Conversational Method in Indigenous Research1
Kovach, M. (2020) · First Peoples Child & Family Review · doi:10.7202/1071291ar · Cited by 147
Tupper, J. (2013) · in education · doi:10.37119/ojs2011.v17i3.71 · Cited by 61
Korteweg, L., & Fiddler, T. (2019) · McGill Journal of Education · doi:10.7202/1058397ar · Cited by 28
Wiltse, L., Johnston, I., & Yang, K. (2014) · Changing English · doi:10.1080/1358684x.2014.929287 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Schick, C., & Denis, V. S.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation
- Publisher
- The Canadian Society for the Study of Education/La Societe canadienne pour l'etude de l'education
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295
- ISSN
- 0380-2361 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W98641243
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 20.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- national discourse, whiteness, critical whiteness studies, Aboriginal education, intercultural relations, racial identity development, Euro-Canadians, Canadian prairies, ethnocultural identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Troubling National Discourses in Anti-Racist Curricular Planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/4126472
- The paper
- Schick, C., & Denis, V. S. (2005). Troubling National Discourses in Anti-Racist Curricular Planning. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126472