The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introduction to the Theory of Grammar
Abstract
In the last 30 years, linguists have built a considerable and highly sophisticated body of work on generative grammar. Today the field is more active than ever before. Introduction to the Theory of Grammar makes available to teachers and students of syntax a comprehensive critical review of the main results of present day grammatical theory and shows how they were achieved. It presents the central questions, shows how and why they were asked, what the answers were, and how these have led to new questions.Part I discusses the way in which the overly rich, descriptive rule systems of the fifties and sixties have gradually been replaced by simpler, more constrained rule systems. Much of the work originally done by stipulations in the rules themselves has been taken over by general, universal principles which govern the form and functioning of these rules and the properties of their inputs and outputs. The establishment of such a theory of principles is the main topic of Part II.Part III addresses the problem of how semantics fits into grammar and elaborates a conception of how the syntactic properties of logical representations can be integrated into the overall theory of grammar. The rules and principles of grammar developed in these parts account for grammatical phenomena in an essentially modular way, and this system of modules, which constitutes the study of grammar today, is established in Part IV.An Epilogue describes such current developments as generalized binding, phrase structure, small clauses, tree geometry and NP-structure.Henk van Riemsdijk is full professor in the Department of Language and Literature, Tilburg University, Holland. Edwin Williams is professor of linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Introduction to the Theory of Grammar is twelfth in the series Current Studies in Linguistics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Argument Structure and Morphology
WILLIAMS, E. (1981) · The Linguistic Review · doi:10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81 · Cited by 991
Self-citationLakoff, G. (1972) · Semantics of Natural Language · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_19 · Cited by 189
Cited by
Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection
Dowty, D. R. (1991) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1991.0021 · Cited by 4,480
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01260-0 · Cited by 2,858
On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’
Dowty, D. R. (1989) · Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2723-0_3 · Cited by 608
Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00043521 · Cited by 520
Consciousness, explanatory inversion and cognitive science
Searle, J. R. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00029587 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldsmith, J., van Riemsdijk, H., & Williams, E.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 150
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004895425
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 2
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introduction to the Theory of Grammar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/414851
- The paper
- Goldsmith, J., van Riemsdijk, H., & Williams, E. (1989). Introduction to the Theory of Grammar. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/414851
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.