Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9,880

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction to Functional Grammar

Matthiessen, Christian, Halliday, M. A. K.·1989·Language

Abstract

This third edition of An Introduction to Functional Grammar has been extensively revised. While retaining the organization and coverage of the earlier editions, it incorporates a considerable amount of new material. This includes strengthening the grammar through the use of data from a large-scale corpus, upgrading the description throughout, and giving greater emphasis to the systemic perspective, in which grammaticalization is understood in the context of an overall model of language.The approach taken in the book overcomes the distinction between theoretical and applied linguistics. The description of grammar is grounded in a comprehensive theory, but it is a theory which evolves in the process of being applied.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/414947

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Halliday, 1978, Language as social semiotic
  2. Dik, 1978, Functional grammar
  3. Berry, 1981, Studies in discourse analysis
  4. Martin, 1981, Working Papers in Linguistics
  5. Halliday, 1970a, Functional diversity in language, as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English, Foundations of Language, 6
  6. Givón, 1979, On understanding grammar
  7. 10.1017/S0022226700001328 · DOI
  8. Halliday, 1979, Function and context in linguistic analysis: Essays offered to William Haas, 57
  9. Kasper, Robert . 1988. Systemic grammar and functional unification grammar. In Benson & Greaves (eds.), 176–200.
  10. 10.1080/00437956.1961.11659756 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1075/z.17 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bateman, 1987, Designing a computational systemic grammar for text generation: A progress report
  13. Halliday, 1971, Literary style: A symposium, 362
  14. 1988, The Nominal Group in Bahasa Indonesia
  15. Halliday, 1985, Language, context and text: A social semiotic perspective
  16. Shieber, 1986, An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar
  17. Halliday, 1973, Explorations of the functions of language
  18. Halliday, 1977, Grammars and descriptions, 176
  19. Fries, Peter . 1985. How does a story mean what it does? A partial answer. In Benson & Greaves (eds.), 295–322.
  20. Halliday, 1970b, A course in Spoken English: Intonation
  21. Benson, 1988, Systemic functional approaches to discourse: Selected papers from the Twelfth International Systemic Workshop
  22. Foley, 1984, Functional syntax and universal grammar
  23. Birch, 1988, Functions of style
  24. Martin, 1980, Working Papers in Linguistics
  25. Benson, 1985, Systemic perspectives on discourse, Vol. 1
  26. Fries, 1982, On repetition and interpretation, Forum Linguisticum, 7, 50
  27. 10.1080/07268608308599299 · DOI
  28. Halliday, 1976, Cohesion in English.
  29. 10.1515/9783111357447 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hasan, 1978, Current trends in text linguistics
  31. Halliday, 1985, 1, 29
  32. Eiler, 1986, Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives, 49
  33. Martin, 1986b, Grammaticalising ecology: The politics of baby seals and kangaroos. Semiotics—language—ideology (Sydney Studies in Society and Culture, No. 3)
  34. Halliday, 1970c, New horizons in linguistics
  35. Painter, 1984, Into the mother tongue. A case study in early language development
  36. Ouyang, 1986, Clause complex in Chinese
  37. Halliday, 1967a, Grammar, society and the noun
  38. Fries, 1981, Reprinted in Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts, 1983
  39. 10.1017/S0022226700012949 · DOI
  40. Hasan, Ruqaiya . 1988. The analysis of one poem: Theoretical issues in practice. In Birch & O'Toole (eds.), 45–74.
  41. Halliday, 1982, Language form and linguistic variation: Papers dedicated to Angus McIntosh
  42. Butler, 1985, Systemic linguistics: Theory and applications
  43. Winograd, 1983, Language as a cognitive process, Vol. 1
  44. Halliday, 1969, Options and functions in the English clause, Brno Studies in English, 8
  45. Long, 1981, Transitivity in Chinese
  46. Halliday, M. A. K. 1970d. On functional grammars. Paper presented at the Seminar on the Construction of Complex Grammars, Cambridge, MA.
  47. Fawcett, 1980, Cognitive linguistics and social interaction
  48. Hasan, Ruqaiya . 1985. Linguistics, language and verbal art. Deakin University Press (Language and Learning Series).

Cited by

See all 9,880

Metadata

Authors
Matthiessen, C., & Halliday, M. A. K.
Venue
Language
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1989-12
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
862
ISSN
0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019413183
Cited by
9,880
References
1
FWCI
1926.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.