Cited by 682Auction Theory and ApplicationsConsumer Market Behavior and PricingDigital Platforms and Economics

On Product Uncertainty in Online Markets: Theory and Evidence1

Dimoka, Angelika, Hong, Yili, Pavlou, Paul A.·2012·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

Online markets pose a difficulty for evaluating products, particularly experience goods, such as used cars, that cannot be easily described online. This exacerbates product uncertainty, the buyer's difficulty in evaluating product characteristics, and predicting how a product will perform in the future. However, the IS literature has focused on seller uncertainty and ignored product uncertainty. To address this void, this study conceptualizes product uncertainty and examines its effects and antecedents in online markets for used cars (eBay Motors). Extending the information asymmetry literature from the seller to the product, we first theorize the nature and dimensions (description and performance) of product uncertainty. Second, we propose product uncertainty to be distinct from, yet shaped by, seller uncertainty. Third, we conjecture product uncertainty to negatively affect price premiums in online markets beyond seller uncertainty. Fourth, based on the information signaling literature, we describe how information signals (diagnostic product descriptions and third-party product assurances) reduce product uncertainty. The structural model is validated by a unique dataset comprised of secondary transaction data from used cars on eBay Motors matched with primary data from 331 buyers who bid on these used cars. The results distinguish between product and seller uncertainty, show that product uncertainty has a stronger effect on price premiums than seller uncertainty, and identi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/41703461

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimoka, A., Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2012-06-01
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
395-426
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W3121659628
Cited by
682
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 3
FWCI
32.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • MIS Quarterly
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
product uncertainty, digital markets, used cars, experience goods, information asymmetry, price premium, information signaling, product descriptions, online auctions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review