The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What Is Philosophy?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect
Thrift, N. (2004) · Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography · doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x · Cited by 1,919
Blackness and Nothingness (Mysticism in the Flesh)
Moten, F. (2013) · South Atlantic Quarterly · doi:10.1215/00382876-2345261 · Cited by 748
Methodological Immaturity in Childhood Research?: Thinking through `participatory methods'
Gallacher, L.-A., & Gallagher, M. (2008) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568208091672 · Cited by 685
Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies
Robinson, J. (2016) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132515598025 · Cited by 659
A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data
Taguchi, H. L. (2012) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700112456001 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Stuhr, J. J., Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., Tomlinson, H., Burchell, G., & Conley, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181
- ISSN
- 0021-8529 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801681773
- Cited by
- 1,740
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 88.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Is Philosophy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/431089
- The paper
- Stuhr, J. J., Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., Tomlinson, H., Burchell, G., & Conley, T. (1996). What Is Philosophy? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. https://doi.org/10.2307/431089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
