Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,672

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature

Huhn, Tom, Bourdieu, Pierre, Johnson, Randal·1996·The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism

Abstract

Part 1 The field of cultural production: the field of cultural production, or - the economic world reversed the production of belief - contribution to an economy of symbolic goods the market of symbolic goods. Part 2 Flaubert and the French literary field: is the structure of sentimental education an instance of social self-analysis? field of power, literary field and habitus principles for a sociology of cultural works Flaubert's point of view. Part 3 The pure gaze - essays on art: outline of a sociological theory of art perception the institutionalization of Anomie the historical genesis of a pure aesthetic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/431688

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 4,672

Metadata

Authors
Huhn, T., Bourdieu, P., & Johnson, R.
Venue
The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
88
ISSN
0021-8529 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1552922347
Cited by
4,672
References
0
FWCI
88.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/431688
The paper
Huhn, T., Bourdieu, P., & Johnson, R. (1996). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. https://doi.org/10.2307/431688

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.