A Metaphysics of Cumulative Penetration: Process Theory and Hua-yen Buddhism
Abstract
Research Article| July 01 1981 A Metaphysics of Cumulative Penetration: Process Theory and Hua-yen Buddhism Steve Odin Steve Odin Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Process Studies (1981) 11 (2): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/44798149 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Steve Odin; A Metaphysics of Cumulative Penetration: Process Theory and Hua-yen Buddhism. Process Studies 1 January 1981; 11 (2): 65–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/44798149 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveUniversity of Illinois PressProcess Studies Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © Copyright 1981 Process Studies1981 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modern biographers of Yuan Zhen refute, using contemporary documentation, the suggestion that Yuan Zhen and Xue Tao met.
“modern biographers of Yuan Zhen, whose life is known about in some detail, examine the evidence of this source and refute on the basis of contemporary documentation the very suggestion that the two even met.”
From The Woman Who Invented Notepaper: Towards a Comparative Historiography of Paper and Print (2011) · cites this paper as [49]
- Authors
- Odin, S.
- Corresponding author
- Odin, Steve
- Venue
- Process Studies
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 1981-07-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 65-82
- ISSN
- 0360-6503 (ISSN-L)
- 2154-3682
- OpenAlex
- W4312404912
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Process Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Whitehead's Philosophy and Applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- process philosophy, Hua-yen Buddhism, metaphysics, process ontology, Buddhist philosophy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
