Cited by 27World Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactTwentieth Century Scientific DevelopmentsHistory and International Relations

The uneasy alliance: Roosevelt, Churchill, and the atomic bomb, 1940–1945

Bernstein, Barton J.·1976·The Western Political Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/448105

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernstein, B. J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Bernstein, Barton J.
Venue
The Western Political Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1976-06
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
202
ISSN
0043-4078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072559057
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Western Political Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › History and International Relations
Keywords
Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, atomic bomb, Anglo-American alliance, World War II, nuclear weapons, atomic diplomacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review