Cited by 49Swearing, Euphemism, MultilingualismEuropean Cultural and National IdentitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

A Study of Ethnic Slurs: The Jew and the Polack in the United States

Dundes, Alan·1971·The Journal of American Folklore

Abstract

ONE OF THE MOST INTERESTING ASPECTS of the study of man concerns the alleged or actual character traits of different cultures and subcultures. In anthropology and psychology there is a vast literature devoted to character, ethnic psychology or Volkscharakter.1 While some scholars have despaired of ever arriving at a rigorous description of the modal or fundamental character of different groups, there seems little doubt that different peoples do manifest different personality traits. Interest in such matters depends, of course, upon whether a particular investigator wishes to emphasize the essential similarities of peoples or to dwell upon the various differences. There is an equally large literature on the apparently universal propensity of man to stereotype. Ever since the coining of the term by journalist Walter Lippmann in his book Public Opinion in 1922, social psychologists among others have actively sought to refine the concept and to document its existence and influence.2 Attention has been given both to stereotypes of self and to stereotypes of others. In addition, there have been special studies concerned with the relationship between stereotypes and prejudice. It seems clear that stereotypes do contribute materially to the formation and perpetuation of deep-seated prejudices. Yet, in examining the extensive national character and stereotype scholarship, one finds surprisingly little reference to the materials of folklore. Stereotypes are described almost solely on t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/538989

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A contribution Dundes made particularly to antisemitism and Jewish studies was to reexamine 'classic' antisemitic tropes such as the 'Wandering Jew' and 'Blood Libel' legends contextually, symbolically, and psychologically as living traditions in addition to emerging 'modern' material of 'sick' humor cycles and ethnic slurs.

    “Toward that end, a contribution he made particularly to antisemitism and Jewish studies was to reexamine”

    From Introduction: Folklore and Ethnology of Antisemitism (2026) · cites this paper as Dundes 1971

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dundes, A.
Corresponding author
Dundes, Alan
Venue
The Journal of American Folklore
Published
1971-04
Volume
84
Issue
332
Pages
186
ISSN
0021-8715 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334813703
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of American Folklore (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › European Cultural and National Identity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
ethnic slurs, stereotypes, prejudice, national character, American Jews, Polish Americans, folklore, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review