Gender Differences in Reporting of Battering Incidences
Abstract
This article examines the difference between male and female reports of violence and threats of violence directed by the man towards the woman. All men in the study were clients in a large batterers' treatment program in the Midwest. Both men and their female partners completed a modified version of the Conflict Tactics Scale at intake and 1 year later at follow-up. In many categories, significantly more women were found at intake to report higher frequencies of threats and violence than their male partners. At follow-up and after extensive intervention these differences were not found in the more severe categories of violence. Differences remained, however, in the less concrete realm of threats of violence and in less severe forms of violence such as pushing and shoving.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is evidence of gender discrepancies and perpetrator-victim discrepancies in reporting.
“Evidence of gender discrepancies and perpetrator-victim discrepancies (Edleson & Brygger, 1986;O'Leary & Arias, 1988) are important considerations for the effective administration of emotional IPV assessment.”
From The relationship between emotional intimate partner violence and other forms of violence: A metaanalytic review. (2024) · cites this paper as Edleson & Brygger, 1986
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physical aggression in early marriage: Prerelationship and relationship effects.
O'Leary, K. D., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1994) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.62.3.594 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Palmer, M. L., Keilholtz, B. M., Vail, S. L., & Spencer, C. M. (2024) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12992 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Edleson, J. L., & Brygger, M. P.
- Venue
- Family Relations
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377
- ISSN
- 0197-6664
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review