The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Grading of Occupations
Abstract
t-T1HIS IS the first report of work undertaken as the result of a grant | received by the London School of Economics from the Trustees of v the Nuffield Foundation. The purpose of the research is to discover the chief factors responsible for social class differences, for movement and hlndrances to movement from class to class under present conditions) and for the changes that have been taking place in the class structure of the population of England and Wales in recent years. Although the first approach to the problem must be general, because no class in the population is selfcontained and the boundary between neighbounng classes is bluxTed, interest will be centred chiefly in the middle class, for about this class much is surmised and little is known with certainty; past studies have been confined for the most part to the so-called working class. A survey of a large random sample of the population on a nation-wide scale is being camed out in order to discover possible evidence of class mobility by change of occupational grade with changing circumstances, also by comparing the grades of parents and their children and by change of grade on the part of women on mamage if the grade of occupation of the husband differs from that of the fe's father. The grade of occupation first entered is largely detened by educational opportunity, and particulars as to education as well as occupation will be collected in the random sample surveyv A report on this work will be published in due course. Occupational status is of course not the only factor which contributes to the detertnination of class but, being closely linked with economic status, it obviously has a very important beanng on class. If then we are to trace changes in social class by changes in occupation, a preliminary examination of the social grading of occupations is essential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27 · Cited by 1,766
EXPLAINING EDUCATIONAL DIFFERENTIALS: TOWARDS A FORMAL RATIONAL ACTION THEORY
Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/104346397009003002 · Cited by 1,644
The Raven's Progressive Matrices: Change and Stability over Culture and Time
Raven, J. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735 · Cited by 1,560
The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach
Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00073-4 · Cited by 1,116
Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion, Reform, and Opportunity in Irish Education, 1921-75
Raftery, A. E., & Hout, M. (1993) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.2307/2112784 · Cited by 1,051
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, J., & Jones, D. C.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1950-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31
- ISSN
- 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2322624748
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Grading of Occupations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/587306
- The paper
- Hall, J., & Jones, D. C. (1950). Social Grading of Occupations. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/587306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.