The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x · Cited by 2,311
Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106289252 · Cited by 1,544
PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation
Lasch, K. E., Marquis, P., Vigneux, M., Abetz, L., Arnould, B., Bayliss, M., Crawford, B., & Rosa, K. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6 · Cited by 461
“ti is designed to facilitate the storage, coding, and retrieval of qualitative data using Boolean operators [41].”
MethodData Alive! The Thinking Behind NVivo
Richards, L. (1999) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239900900310 · Cited by 164
Presurgery Experiences of Prostate Cancer Patients and Their Spouses
Gray, R. E., Fitch, M. I., Phillips, C., Labrecque, M., & Klotz, L. (1999) · Cancer Practice · doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.1999.07308.x · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Fielding, N., Weitzman, E. A., & Miles, M. B.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 742
- ISSN
- 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321500347
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 142.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/591109
- The paper
- Fielding, N., Weitzman, E. A., & Miles, M. B. (1996). Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/591109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
