Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7Indian and Buddhist StudiesClassical Studies and PhilologyTranslation Studies and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Some Notes on the Relationship between the Abhisamayālaṅkāra, the Revised Pañcaviṁśatisāhasrikā, and the Chinese Translations of the Unrevised Pañcaviṁśatisāhasrikā

Lethcoe, Nancey R.·1976·Journal of the American Oriental Society

Abstract

Nancey R. Lethcoe, Some Notes on the Relationship between the Abhisamayālaṅkāra, the Revised Pañcaviṁśatisāhasrikā, and the Chinese Translations of the Unrevised Pañcaviṁśatisāhasrikā, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 96, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1976), pp. 499-511

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/600082

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Lethcoe, N. R.
Corresponding author
Lethcoe, Nancey R.
Venue
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1976-10
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
499
ISSN
0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2325298818
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
Keywords
Chinese translation, Prajñāpāramitā literature, Mahayana Buddhism, textual relations, Chinese Buddhist texts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.