The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Prātimokṣa Puzzle: Fact versus Fantasy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When we turn the tables and search for references to deep meditation, we see that these are far more common in the Majjhima than in the Saṃyutta.37”
From Performing the Buddha’s Word: The Role of the Bhāṇaka (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the equations governing the axisymmetric perturbations of the Kerr black hole
Chandrasekhar, S., & Detweiler, S. L. (1975) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1975.0130 · Cited by 45
Historio-Critical Hermeneutics in the Study of Women in Early Indian Buddhism
Collett, A. (2008) · Numen · doi:10.1163/156852708x373276 · Cited by 20
Performing the Buddha’s Word: The Role of the Bhāṇaka
Shulman, E. (2024) · Numen · doi:10.1163/15685276-20240005 · Cited by 2
Michel Foucault and the “care of the self” approach to the Buddhist dharma
Voyce, M. (2017) · South African Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/02580136.2017.1327837 · Cited by 2
The Double-Movement Model of Forgiveness in Buddhist and Christian Rituals
Reasoner, P., & Taliaferro, C. C. (2009) · European Journal for Philosophy of Religion · doi:10.24204/ejpr.v1i1.328
Metadata
- Authors
- Prebish, C. S.
- Corresponding author
- Prebish, Charles S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oriental Society
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1974-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168
- ISSN
- 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2324447091
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 19.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Vinaya Piṭaka, Buddhist monastic discipline, Pali canon, textual authenticity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prātimokṣa Puzzle: Fact versus Fantasy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/600888
- The paper
- Prebish, C. S. (1974). The Prātimokṣa Puzzle: Fact versus Fantasy. Journal of the American Oriental Society. https://doi.org/10.2307/600888
