Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epigraphic Remains of Indian Traders in Egypt

Salomon, Richard·1991·Journal of the American Oriental Society

Abstract

A handful of little known fragments of inscriptions in Indian languages and scripts found in Egypt provide epigraphical corroboration for the copious testimony of classical sources about the flourishing trade between India and the Roman Empire. These include three records from the Red Sea port of Quseir, one in Prakrit and two in Old Tamil, whose linguistic and paleographic features point toward South India as the place of origin of the Indian merchants in Egypt. This accords with the evidence from a fragmentary Greek farce from Oxyrhyncus containing garbled imitations of an Indian language which, according to some scholars, may be an archaic form of Kannada or some other Dravidian language. Also, a Greek inscription from RedEs-ye invoking the blessings of Pan apparently bears the name of a Hellenized Indian 16(pov, perhaps = Subhanu. Thus the epigraphic material attests to the presence of both temporary sojourners and long-term assimilated residents among Indians in Egypt during the early centuries of the Christian era.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/603404

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Salomon, R.
Venue
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1991-10
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
731
ISSN
0003-0279
Cited by
18
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review