The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Narām-Sîn of Ešnunna or Akkad?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Figurative evidence from the first millennium BCE suggests that in astrological and astronomical contexts the sign MUŠ was read simply as bašmu at that time, broadly contemporary with the Neo-Assyrian recension of Etana.
“Figurative evidence from the first millennium bce in turn suggests that the sign MUŠ in astrological and astronomical contexts was indeed read simply as bašmu at that time, which is broadly contemporary with the Neo-Assyrian recension of Etana .”
From Eagle and the Snake, or anzû and bašmu?: Another Mythological Dimension in the Epic of Etana (2021) · cites this paper as Lambert 1986: 793
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eagle and the Snake, or anzû and bašmu?: Another Mythological Dimension in the Epic of Etana
Valk, J. (2021) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.4.0889 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambert, W. G.
- Corresponding author
- Lambert, W. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oriental Society
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 793
- ISSN
- 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2326637566
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Keywords
- Naram-Sin, Akkad, Old Akkadian period, Ur III dynasty, Sumerian kingship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
