Cited by 18Indian and Buddhist StudiesEurasian Exchange NetworksStudy and Philosophy of Religion

On the Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing Relics and Dhâraṇîs in Stûpas and Images

Bentor, Yael·1995·Journal of the American Oriental Society

Abstract

Yael Bentor, On the Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing Relics and Dhâraṇîs in Stûpas and Images, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 115, No. 2 (Apr. - Jun., 1995), pp. 248-261

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/604668

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bentor, Y.
Corresponding author
Bentor, Yael
Venue
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-04
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
248
ISSN
0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2474168091
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Eurasian Exchange Networks
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
dhāraṇī, Buddhist stupa, Buddhist images, Tibetan Buddhism, Buddhist iconography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review