Cited by 302Disability Rights and RepresentationUrban Transport and AccessibilityHistorical Geography and Geographical Thought

Geography and the disabled: a survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations

Golledge, Reginald G.·1993·Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers

Abstract

Reginald G. Golledge, Geography and the Disabled: A Survey with Special Reference to Vision Impaired and Blind Populations, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 18, No. 1 (1993), pp. 63-85

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/623069

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Golledge, R. G.
Corresponding author
Golledge, Reginald G.
Venue
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1993
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
63
ISSN
0020-2754 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316423728
Cited by
302
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
Keywords
disability, geography of disability, visual impairment, blindness, blind people, accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review